Archive for April, 2006

ID is Bad Theology

One of the positions I’ve held is that Creationism and its sibling, Intelligent Design (ID) are simply bad theology. It is hard to find others who support that view, as most often the debaters are either devout Christians who support Creationism or ID as a matter of faith, or people supporting the physical sciences [...]

Read More..>>

Wild Wooley Internet

Seems one of my favorite Disney Fan sites, Jim Hill Media, is down with the terse message “This IP address cannot be used for browsing.” I suspect the site has been hacked, as it was there a few days ago. (Update on 4/30/06 — Jim Hill Media is back up and running, [...]

Read More..>>

Does Science = Atheism?

One of my favorite sites, Panda’s Thumb, seems to have its share of what I’ll describe as strident anti-religion evolutionists.
Its not unexpected that a response to an unfounded challenge would be met with a dose of cynicsim, but its my observation that the more strident folks seem to be serving another agenda. [...]

Read More..>>

United 93: Yes, I will see it

There is some “controversy” over the premier of United 93, the film both liberal and conservative reviewers are saying is “not political, not ideological” (Roger Ebert) with “supurb production values” (Michael Medved). Where’s the controversy?
There’s a reluctance in our poisoned political atmosphere to give any ground, and some of the hysterical left (HL) evidently [...]

Read More..>>

Fast Mutations and Witch’s Brew

One of the questions raised by Creationists, and the one that had me stumped and in their camp before Stephen Jay Gould came along in the mid 1970s is the “Cambrian Explosion” (hereinafter called the “Big CE”).
What I had been taught in high school was that evolution happened through steady changes in the [...]

Read More..>>

Top |  Next Page »